Skip to paper

Chapter 3 of 3

§Amplitudes with local coordinates

We use the Majorana VOSA of the preceding chapter and the Wick theorem Proposition 2.4.

§3.1 Local coordinates and the amplitude

Choose distinct finite punctures ziz_i on the sphere. A local coordinate at ziz_i is an invertible germ

u=fi(x),x=z−zi,fi(0)=0,fi′(0)≠0.u=f_i(x),\qquad x=z-z_i,\qquad f_i(0)=0,\quad f_i'(0)\ne0.

Thus fif_i maps the global displacement xx to the local coordinate uu. For boundary insertions in the upper half-plane, take zi∈Rz_i\in\mathbb R and boundary-compatible local coordinates. All inserted fields below remain at ziz_i.

For any origin-fixing germ ff, write

f(x)=αexp⁡ ⁣(∑m≥1Amxm+1∂x)x,W(f)=exp⁡ ⁣(−∑m≥1AmLm)α−L0.f(x)=\alpha\exp\!\left(\sum_{m\geq1}A_mx^{m+1}\partial_x\right)x, \qquad W(f)=\exp\!\left(-\sum_{m\geq1}A_mL_m\right)\alpha^{-L_0}.

The coefficients AmA_m are determined recursively. Choose a logarithm of α=f′(0)\alpha=f'(0) and use compatible lifts under composition. Then

W(f)W(g)=W(g∘f),W(f−1)=W(f)−1.W(f)W(g)=W(g\circ f),\qquad W(f^{-1})=W(f)^{-1}.

On each state of FF, the positive Virasoro modes lower weight, so the exponential is a finite sum. This is the coordinate-change convention of Meng–Lan–Gu, Appendix D.1.

Definition 3.1 (Amplitude with local coordinates)

For states ai∈Fa_i\in F, define the normalized chiral vacuum amplitude by

A^f(a1,…,an)=⟨Y(W(f1)a1,z1)⋯Y(W(fn)an,zn)⟩.\widehat{\mathcal A}_f(a_1,\ldots,a_n) =\left\langle Y(W(f_1)a_1,z_1)\cdots Y(W(f_n)a_n,z_n) \right\rangle.

The expectation is the vacuum expectation of Proposition 2.4, read as a rational function in the ordered insertion points. In particular, A^f(1,…,1)=1\widehat{\mathcal A}_f(\mathbf1,\ldots,\mathbf1)=1.

This is the vacuum-sector specialization of the decorated-sphere amplitude in Appendix D.1, with the outgoing vacuum at infinity. For the primary state ψ\psi,

Y(W(fi)ψ,zi)=fi′(0)−1/2ψ(zi).Y(W(f_i)\psi,z_i)=f_i'(0)^{-1/2}\psi(z_i).

For descendants, the positive Virasoro modes in W(fi)W(f_i) also contribute. The following identities compute these transformed states.

§3.2 Coordinate covariance and descendant insertions

Put

gi=fi−1,φi(u)=zi+gi(u),λi=gi′(0),si(u)2=gi′(u).g_i=f_i^{-1},\qquad \varphi_i(u)=z_i+g_i(u),\qquad \lambda_i=g_i'(0),\qquad s_i(u)^2=g_i'(u).

Here φi\varphi_i is the insertion map from the local disk to the sphere; it is inverse to the local coordinate function z↦fi(z−zi)z\mapsto f_i(z-z_i). The square-root branch is fixed by the chosen lift of fif_i.

Proposition 3.2 (Coordinate covariance of the fermion)

For an invertible germ g(u)=λu+O(u2)g(u)=\lambda u+O(u^2),

W(g)−1ψ(u)W(g)=g′(u) ψ(g(u)),W(g)^{-1}\psi(u)W(g) =\sqrt{g'(u)}\,\psi(g(u)),

where g′(0)=λ1/2\sqrt{g'(0)}=\lambda^{1/2} with the chosen logarithm.

Proof.

By Exercise 1.5 and the primarity of ψ\psi,

[Lm,ψ(u)]=(um+1∂u+m+12um)ψ(u).[L_m,\psi(u)] =\left(u^{m+1}\partial_u+\frac{m+1}{2}u^m\right)\psi(u).

Write g(u)=λexp⁡(v(u)∂u)ug(u)=\lambda\exp(v(u)\partial_u)u, where v(u)=∑m≥1Amum+1v(u)=\sum_{m\geq1}A_mu^{m+1}, and set A=∑m≥1AmLmA=\sum_{m\geq1}A_mL_m. Then

[A,ψ(u)]=(v(u)∂u+12v′(u))ψ(u).[A,\psi(u)]=\left(v(u)\partial_u+\frac12v'(u)\right)\psi(u).

Let gt(u)=exp⁡(tv(u)∂u)ug_t(u)=\exp(t v(u)\partial_u)u. The field Ft(u)=etAψ(u)e−tAF_t(u)=e^{tA}\psi(u)e^{-tA} satisfies

∂tFt(u)=(v(u)∂u+12v′(u))Ft(u),F0(u)=ψ(u).\partial_tF_t(u)=\left(v(u)\partial_u+\frac12v'(u)\right)F_t(u), \qquad F_0(u)=\psi(u).

The chain rule shows that gt′(u) ψ(gt(u))\sqrt{g_t'(u)}\,\psi(g_t(u)) satisfies the same equation and initial condition, with square root 11 at t=0t=0. Uniqueness of formal power-series solutions gives

eAψ(u)e−A=g1′(u) ψ(g1(u)).e^A\psi(u)e^{-A}=\sqrt{g_1'(u)}\,\psi(g_1(u)).

Similarly, the L0L_0 commutator gives

λL0ψ(u)λ−L0=λ1/2ψ(λu).\lambda^{L_0}\psi(u)\lambda^{-L_0} =\lambda^{1/2}\psi(\lambda u).

Since W(g)−1=λL0eAW(g)^{-1}=\lambda^{L_0}e^A and g=λg1g=\lambda g_1, combining these two identities proves the proposition.

Corollary 3.3 (Generating transformed descendants)

The fields inserted in Definition 3.1 satisfy

Ψi(u):=Y(W(fi)euTψ,zi)=si(u)ψ(φi(u)).\Psi_i(u):=Y(W(f_i)e^{uT}\psi,z_i) =s_i(u)\psi(\varphi_i(u)).

Its coefficients give the transformed descendants at the fixed puncture ziz_i:

[um]Ψi(u)=1m!Y(W(fi)Tmψ,zi),m≥0.[u^m]\Psi_i(u) =\frac1{m!}Y(W(f_i)T^m\psi,z_i),\qquad m\geq0.
Proof.

Since W(fi)=W(gi)−1W(f_i)=W(g_i)^{-1} and W(gi)1=1W(g_i)\mathbf1=\mathbf1, apply Proposition 3.2 to the vacuum and use creation:

W(fi)euTψ=si(u)egi(u)Tψ.W(f_i)e^{uT}\psi =s_i(u)e^{g_i(u)T}\psi.

Applying Y( ⋅ ,zi)Y(\,\cdot\,,z_i) coefficientwise, translation gives

Y(W(fi)euTψ,zi)=si(u)Y(ψ,zi+gi(u)),Y(W(f_i)e^{uT}\psi,z_i) =s_i(u)Y(\psi,z_i+g_i(u)),

which is the asserted identity.

For example,

[u0]Ψi(u)=Y(W(fi)ψ,zi)=λi1/2ψ(zi),[u1]Ψi(u)=Y(W(fi)Tψ,zi)=λi3/2∂ψ(zi)+gi′′(0)2λi1/2ψ(zi).\begin{aligned} [u^0]\Psi_i(u) &=Y(W(f_i)\psi,z_i)=\lambda_i^{1/2}\psi(z_i),\\ [u^1]\Psi_i(u) &=Y(W(f_i)T\psi,z_i)\\ &=\lambda_i^{3/2}\partial\psi(z_i) +\frac{g_i''(0)}{2\lambda_i^{1/2}}\psi(z_i). \end{aligned}

Thus Ψi\Psi_i is a way to compute the fields in the amplitude definition. Extracting coefficients at u=0u=0 keeps their insertion point at ziz_i.

§3.3 Regularized contractions and Pfaffian amplitudes

For states containing several fermions, use a separate local variable for each constituent and normal order in those local variables. The local vacuum contraction is 1/(u−v)1/(u-v). After the coordinate change, the contraction of the generating fields is si(u)sj(v)/(φi(u)−φj(v))s_i(u)s_j(v)/(\varphi_i(u)-\varphi_j(v)).

Definition 3.4 (Regularized contraction kernel)

Define

Kij(u,v)={si(u)sj(v)φi(u)−φj(v),i≠j,si(u)si(v)φi(u)−φi(v)−1u−v,i=j.K_{ij}(u,v)= \begin{cases} \displaystyle\frac{s_i(u)s_j(v)}{\varphi_i(u)-\varphi_j(v)},&i\ne j,\\[3mm] \displaystyle\frac{s_i(u)s_i(v)}{\varphi_i(u)-\varphi_i(v)}-\frac1{u-v},&i=j. \end{cases}

These are Taylor series at (0,0)(0,0) and satisfy Kij(u,v)=−Kji(v,u)K_{ij}(u,v)=-K_{ji}(v,u). For positive half-integers r,sr,s, set

M(i,r),(j,s)=[ur−12vs−12]Kij(u,v).M_{(i,r),(j,s)} =[u^{r-\frac12}v^{s-\frac12}]K_{ij}(u,v).

Thus MT=−MM^{\mathsf T}=-M. The brackets extract Taylor coefficients, including the factorial normalization of derivatives.

The subtraction removes the local vacuum contraction. For φi(u)=zi+u\varphi_i(u)=z_i+u, the entire diagonal block vanishes, recovering the usual rule that contractions occur only between different normal-ordered factors. For a nonlinear coordinate, its regular remainder may be nonzero. These diagonal blocks encode the finite change of normal ordering.

Proposition 3.5 (Pfaffian amplitudes)

Let

ai=ψ−ri,1⋯ψ−ri,ki1,ri,1>⋯>ri,ki>0.a_i=\psi_{-r_{i,1}}\cdots\psi_{-r_{i,k_i}}\mathbf1, \qquad r_{i,1}>\cdots>r_{i,k_i}>0.

Concatenate the occupied labels (i,ri,α)(i,r_{i,\alpha}) in puncture order, preserving the displayed order within each state, to obtain an ordered list II. Then

A^f(a1,…,an)=Pf⁡M[I,I].\widehat{\mathcal A}_f(a_1,\ldots,a_n) =\operatorname{Pf}M[I,I].

For an odd number of occupied modes the amplitude is zero; for the empty list it is 11. The formula extends multilinearly to arbitrary states in FF.

Proof.

Write each state as the coefficient of ∏αuαri,α−1/2\prod_\alpha u_\alpha^{r_{i,\alpha}-1/2} in :ψ(u1)⋯ψ(uki):1:\psi(u_1)\cdots\psi(u_{k_i}):\mathbf1, with normal ordering in the local variables. Apply W(fi)W(f_i) to this state before applying Y( ⋅ ,zi)Y(\,\cdot\,,z_i), as required by Definition 3.1. The conjugation identity in Proposition 3.2 transforms each constituent into Ψi\Psi_i; the local scalar subtractions are unchanged. Wick’s theorem therefore gives pairwise contractions si(u)sj(v)/(φi(u)−φj(v))s_i(u)s_j(v)/(\varphi_i(u)-\varphi_j(v)). Within a group, local normal ordering subtracts 1/(u−v)1/(u-v), leaving exactly KiiK_{ii}.

In each pairing, every variable occurs in exactly one kernel. Extracting the coefficient prescribed by each occupied mode therefore gives a product of entries of MM. The signed sum over pairings is its Pfaffian. In particular, the coefficient convention agrees with

Y(ψ−m−121,z)=1m!∂zmψ(z).Y(\psi_{-m-\frac12}\mathbf1,z) =\frac1{m!}\partial_z^m\psi(z).

§3.4 Finite-mode calculation

For a fixed finite set of modes, compute the required Taylor coefficients of KijK_{ij} once and store MM. Each occupation-basis amplitude then requires only a selected submatrix. A Pfaffian of order NN can be evaluated by pivoted antisymmetric elimination in O(N3)O(N^3) arithmetic operations and O(N2)O(N^2) storage, without enumerating pairings; see Wimmer. The regularization of KiiK_{ii} must be performed in Taylor series before numerical evaluation.

If aia_i has weight hih_i, fermionic exclusion gives

hi≥ki22,N=∑iki≤∑i⌊2hi⌋.h_i\geq\frac{k_i^2}{2},\qquad N=\sum_i k_i\leq\sum_i\lfloor\sqrt{2h_i}\rfloor.

For general states, apply the formula to their occupation-basis expansions. The cost of producing every entry of a tensor with DD states at each puncture still includes its DnD^n output entries. All amplitudes here belong to the Majorana vacuum block; an overall geometric vacuum factor and amplitudes involving spin fields require separate data.

Exercise 3.6 (Coordinate changes and Gaussian amplitudes)

  1. Regularity. Put

    Hi(u,v)=φi(u)−φi(v)u−v.H_i(u,v)=\frac{\varphi_i(u)-\varphi_i(v)}{u-v}.

    Show that HiH_i is an invertible Taylor series and that si(u)si(v)−Hi(u,v)s_i(u)s_i(v)-H_i(u,v) is divisible by (u−v)2(u-v)^2. Deduce the regularity and antisymmetry of KiiK_{ii}, and use

    Kii(u,v)=si(u)si(v)−Hi(u,v)(u−v)Hi(u,v)K_{ii}(u,v)=\frac{s_i(u)s_i(v)-H_i(u,v)}{(u-v)H_i(u,v)}

    to compute its Taylor coefficients without subtracting poles numerically.

  2. The Schwarzian term. Define

    Sf=f′′′f′−32(f′′f′)2.Sf=\frac{f'''}{f'}-\frac32\left(\frac{f''}{f'}\right)^2.

    Prove

    Kii(u,v)=Sφi(0)12(u−v)+terms of total degree at least 2.K_{ii}(u,v)=\frac{S\varphi_i(0)}{12}(u-v) +\text{terms of total degree at least }2.

    Using ω=12ψ−32ψ−121\omega=\tfrac12\psi_{-\frac32}\psi_{-\frac12}\mathbf1, deduce

    A^f(1,…,ω,…,1)=Sφi(0)24.\widehat{\mathcal A}_f(\mathbf1,\ldots,\omega,\ldots,\mathbf1) =\frac{S\varphi_i(0)}{24}.

    More generally, for three punctures, set zij=zi−zjz_{ij}=z_i-z_j and verify

    A^f(ω,ψ,ψ)=s2(0)s3(0)(λ12z232z122z132+Sφ1(0)24z23).\widehat{\mathcal A}_f(\omega,\psi,\psi) =s_2(0)s_3(0)\left( \frac{\lambda_1^2z_{23}}{2z_{12}^2z_{13}^2} +\frac{S\varphi_1(0)}{24z_{23}}\right).

    Identify the pairings responsible for the two terms.

  3. Size of the Pfaffian. Show that the least possible weight of a state with kk occupied fermion modes is 12+32+⋯+(k−12)=k2/2\tfrac12+\tfrac32+\cdots+(k-\tfrac12)=k^2/2. Deduce the bound on NN above.

  4. Generating all amplitudes. For a finite ordered set of mode labels and Grassmann variables θa\theta_a, prove

    exp⁡ ⁣(12∑a,bθaMabθb)=∑I evenPf⁡M[I,I] θI,\exp\!\left(\frac12\sum_{a,b}\theta_aM_{ab}\theta_b\right) =\sum_{I\text{ even}}\operatorname{Pf}M[I,I]\,\theta_I,

    where II runs through subsets in the inherited order and θI\theta_I is the corresponding ordered product. Explain how MM determines all occupation-basis amplitudes without storing the full tensor.

§3.5 Provenance and license

Author: Chenqi Meng. This independent note is released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

The definitions, basic properties, and Majorana example were developed in the VOSA chapter of Introduction to Vertex Operator Algebras, published under CC0. Material previously released under CC0 remains available under those terms. This edition includes the additional treatment of amplitudes with local coordinates.

License · CC BY 4.0 · Peerpedia collaboration terms

Copy reference

This link points to the version you are reading.