Skip to paper

Chapter 7 of 11

§Examples of VOAs

§7.1 The Heisenberg VOA

The rank-one Heisenberg VOA M(1)M(1) describes the current algebra of one chiral free boson. We construct its states and fields explicitly, then verify its conformal structure.

§The oscillator space

Definition 7.1 (Heisenberg vacuum space)

Let

M(1)=C[x1,x2,…],1=1.M(1)=\mathbb C[x_1,x_2,\ldots],\qquad \mathbf1=1.

Every element is a polynomial in finitely many variables. Define operators, for n>0n>0, by

J−n=xn⋅,Jn=n∂∂xn,J0=0.J_{-n}=x_n\cdot,\qquad J_n=n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_n},\qquad J_0=0.

They satisfy the Heisenberg relations

[Jm,Jn]=mδm+n,0id⁡,Jn1=0(n≥0).[J_m,J_n]=m\delta_{m+n,0}\operatorname{id},\qquad J_n\mathbf1=0\quad(n\geq0).

Equivalently, M(1)M(1) has basis

J−n1⋯J−ns1,n1≥⋯≥ns≥1,J_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1, \qquad n_1\geq\cdots\geq n_s\geq1,

including the empty product 1\mathbf1. Set j=J−11j=J_{-1}\mathbf1 and

J(z)=∑n∈ZJnz−n−1.J(z)=\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}J_nz^{-n-1}.

The polynomial realization specifies the action of every mode, not just its commutation relations. In particular, J(z)v∈M(1)((z))J(z)v\in M(1)((z)) for every v∈M(1)v\in M(1).

§The state–field correspondence

Proposition 7.2 (Heisenberg vertex algebra)

There is a unique vertex algebra structure on M(1)M(1) with vacuum 1\mathbf1 and Y(j,z)=J(z)Y(j,z)=J(z). Its fields are

Y(J−n1⋯J−ns1,z)=:∏i=1s∂zni−1J(z)(ni−1)!:,Y(1,z)=id⁡.Y(J_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1,z) =:\prod_{i=1}^s\frac{\partial_z^{n_i-1}J(z)}{(n_i-1)!}:, \qquad Y(\mathbf1,z)=\operatorname{id}.

The colons use the right-nested convention of Definition 2.12. For these factors, this amounts to moving all creation modes J−nJ_{-n} to the left of all annihilation modes JnJ_n, n>0n>0. The translation operator is

T=∑n≥1nxn+1∂∂xn.T=\sum_{n\geq1}n x_{n+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_n}.
Proof.

The Heisenberg relations give

[J(z),J(w)]=∂w(z−1δ(w/z))id⁡,(z−w)2[J(z),J(w)]=0.[J(z),J(w)]=\partial_w\bigl(z^{-1}\delta(w/z)\bigr)\operatorname{id}, \qquad (z-w)^2[J(z),J(w)]=0.

Also T1=0T\mathbf1=0, [T,Jn]=−nJn−1[T,J_n]=-nJ_{n-1}, and J(z)1∈j+zM(1)[[z]]J(z)\mathbf1\in j+zM(1)[[z]]. Thus [T,J(z)]=∂zJ(z)[T,J(z)]=\partial_zJ(z). Derivatives and normal-ordered products preserve mutual locality by Dong’s lemma. The displayed fields consequently satisfy locality and translation covariance; their action on the vacuum is regular with constant term J−n1⋯J−ns1J_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1. Lower truncation follows from the oscillator action. These are the vertex algebra axioms. Uniqueness follows from Corollary 2.13, which forces the displayed formula. See Keller, §3.2.

For example,

Y(J−21,z)=∂zJ(z),Y(J−121,z)=:J(z)2:.Y(J_{-2}\mathbf1,z)=\partial_zJ(z),\qquad Y(J_{-1}^2\mathbf1,z)=:J(z)^2:.

The complete product of the current with its state is

Y(j,z)j=z−21+∑n≥1zn−1J−nJ−11.Y(j,z)j=z^{-2}\mathbf1+ \sum_{n\geq1}z^{n-1}J_{-n}J_{-1}\mathbf1.

Thus j(1)j=1j_{(1)}j=\mathbf1 and j(0)j=0j_{(0)}j=0. This exact series specifies the regular terms as well as the pole.

§The conformal vector

Proposition 7.3 (Heisenberg conformal structure)

The vector

ω=12J−121\omega=\frac12J_{-1}^2\mathbf1

makes M(1)M(1) a VOA of CFT type and central charge 11. Its conformal field and modes are

Y(ω,z)=12:J(z)2:=∑m∈ZLmz−m−2,Lm=12∑r∈Z:Jm−rJr:.Y(\omega,z)=\frac12:J(z)^2: =\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}L_mz^{-m-2},\qquad L_m=\frac12\sum_{r\in\mathbb Z}:J_{m-r}J_r:.

Here mode normal ordering puts negative-index modes to the left. Each sum is finite on a fixed state. Moreover,

[Lm,Jn]=−nJm+n,L−1=T,L0=∑n>0J−nJn.[L_m,J_n]=-nJ_{m+n},\qquad L_{-1}=T,\qquad L_0=\sum_{n>0}J_{-n}J_n.

In particular,

wt⁡(J−n1⋯J−ns1)=n1+⋯+ns.\operatorname{wt}(J_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1) =n_1+\cdots+n_s.
Proof.

Using the Heisenberg relations in the quadratic expression for LmL_m gives

[Lm,Jn]=12∑r(rδr+n,0Jm−r+(m−r)δm−r+n,0Jr)=−nJm+n.\begin{aligned} [L_m,J_n] &=\frac12\sum_r\left( r\delta_{r+n,0}J_{m-r} +(m-r)\delta_{m-r+n,0}J_r\right)\\ &=-nJ_{m+n}. \end{aligned}

The same quadratic expression yields

L−1=∑n>0J−n−1Jn=T,L0=∑n>0nxn∂∂xn.L_{-1}=\sum_{n>0}J_{-n-1}J_n=T,\qquad L_0=\sum_{n>0}n x_n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_n}.

It remains to check the Virasoro relations, including the central term. By the commutator just proved,

Dm,n:=[Lm,Ln]−(m−n)Lm+nD_{m,n}:=[L_m,L_n]-(m-n)L_{m+n}

commutes with every JrJ_r. Any such operator is scalar: commuting with all derivatives forces its value on 1\mathbf1 to be constant, and commuting with all multiplications determines its value on every polynomial. Since Dm,nD_{m,n} has degree −m−n-m-n for the grading above, it vanishes unless m+n=0m+n=0.

For m>0m>0, Lm1=L01=0L_m\mathbf1=L_0\mathbf1=0 and

L−m1=12∑r=1m−1J−rJ−(m−r)1,LmL−m1=12∑r=1m−1r(m−r)1=m3−m121.\begin{aligned} L_{-m}\mathbf1 &=\frac12\sum_{r=1}^{m-1}J_{-r}J_{-(m-r)}\mathbf1,\\ L_mL_{-m}\mathbf1 &=\frac12\sum_{r=1}^{m-1}r(m-r)\mathbf1 =\frac{m^3-m}{12}\mathbf1. \end{aligned}

Consequently,

[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+m3−m12δm+n,0id⁡.[L_m,L_n]=(m-n)L_{m+n} +\frac{m^3-m}{12}\delta_{m+n,0}\operatorname{id}.

Finally, the weight-hh basis is indexed by partitions of hh, so every weight space is finite dimensional, negative weights vanish, and M(1)0=C1M(1)_0=\mathbb C\mathbf1. All VOA axioms follow.

§Basic properties

Proposition 7.4 (Simplicity)

The VOA M(1)M(1) is simple.

Proof.

An ideal is stable under every JnJ_n, hence under all polynomial multiplications and partial derivatives. Given a nonzero polynomial in the ideal, differentiate according to a monomial of maximal total degree. The result is a nonzero constant. Thus the ideal contains 1\mathbf1 and equals M(1)M(1).

The first weight spaces are

M(1)0=C1,M(1)1=Cj,M(1)2=CJ−21⊕CJ−121=CTj⊕Cω.\begin{aligned} M(1)_0&=\mathbb C\mathbf1,\\ M(1)_1&=\mathbb Cj,\\ M(1)_2&=\mathbb C J_{-2}\mathbf1\oplus\mathbb C J_{-1}^2\mathbf1 =\mathbb C Tj\oplus\mathbb C\omega. \end{aligned}

The weight-one Lie algebra is abelian with ⟨j,j⟩=1\langle j,j\rangle=1, yet j(0)=J0=0j_{(0)}=J_0=0 on all of M(1)M(1). Thus its zero-mode action, and the associated inner automorphism group, are trivial even though its current algebra is nontrivial.

Exercise 7.5 (Reflection and composite products)

  1. Show that θ(J−n1⋯J−ns1)=(−1)sJ−n1⋯J−ns1\theta(J_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1)=(-1)^sJ_{-n_1}\cdots J_{-n_s}\mathbf1 is a VOA automorphism and that Aut⁡(M(1))={1,θ}\operatorname{Aut}(M(1))=\{1,\theta\}. Identify the fixed-point space M(1)θM(1)^\theta in the oscillator basis.

  2. For u=J−121u=J_{-1}^2\mathbf1, use Y(u,z)=:J(z)2:Y(u,z)=:J(z)^2: to verify

    u(−1)u=J−141+4J−3J−11.u_{(-1)}u=J_{-1}^4\mathbf1+4J_{-3}J_{-1}\mathbf1.

    Thus a regular VOA product of composite states need not be their ordinary polynomial product.

§7.2 Lattice VOAs

§7.3 Virasoro minimal models

License · CC0 1.0 · Peerpedia collaboration terms

Copy reference

This link points to the version you are reading.